|
tuck vs poke vs flush | tuck | | 0% | [ 0 ] | poke | | 47% | [ 9 ] | flush | | 53% | [ 10 ] |
| Total Votes : 19 | | Poll closed |
|
Author | Message |
---|
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:26 am | |
| |
|
| |
madmanmart staffs.V.duber
Posts : 744 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:30 am | |
| Whats the difference for people who don't talk 'scene'? |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:34 am | |
| haha poke = wheels sticking out a bit
tuck = wheels tucked
flush = bang on no tuck no poke just flush lol |
|
| |
DaveMK3 Mod
Posts : 776 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:44 am | |
| Poke. JUst makes the car look that little bit more mean Not a dub but you get the idea. |
|
| |
Dubbernut staffs.V.duber
Posts : 726 Join date : 2009-07-12
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:36 pm | |
| Suppose ill have to go with poke as mine do a little although i prefer flush. |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:33 pm | |
| depends on the car but i think it can look silly if over done you cant go wrong with flush |
|
| |
luposean staffs.V.duber
Posts : 281 Join date : 2010-08-01
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:44 pm | |
| Poke all the way for me. tuck should be saved for the aircooled deck scrubbers |
|
| |
simon-polo staffs.V.duber
Posts : 569 Join date : 2010-03-08
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 3:59 pm | |
| i like all three.. |
|
| |
benny staffs.V.duber
Posts : 202 Join date : 2010-06-18
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Wed Oct 20, 2010 4:07 pm | |
| i got go with a little bit of poke stick on some camber and they just look mean no matter what the car |
|
| |
georgemk3 Global Mod
Posts : 1076 Join date : 2009-07-03
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Fri Oct 22, 2010 3:00 pm | |
| got to be poke for me flush is always a winner to but not a fan of wheels tucked in the arches |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:10 pm | |
| tuck is defo an aircooled thing |
|
| |
benny staffs.V.duber
Posts : 202 Join date : 2010-06-18
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Fri Oct 22, 2010 6:45 pm | |
| tuck is for air cooled and for the people who want drag the chassis along the floor thanks to air |
|
| |
simon-polo staffs.V.duber
Posts : 569 Join date : 2010-03-08
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sat Oct 23, 2010 2:41 pm | |
| i do love a good poke every now and then |
|
| |
ChrisRivage staffs.V.duber
Posts : 582 Join date : 2009-07-08
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:00 pm | |
| All about moderation if you go stupid on tuck n poke it can look garbage but flush is a safe tbh if the car is running some super low rid height i think you can pull most looks off! |
|
| |
phil Junior Poster
Posts : 190 Join date : 2009-07-11
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:06 pm | |
| id say tuck at the front and flush at the rear with a little camber , poke is no good it jus attcracts unwanted attention, |
|
| |
jake123 Junior Poster
Posts : 41 Join date : 2010-08-12
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:15 am | |
| poke with camber |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:41 pm | |
| It's gotta be poke since my lupo has bit off poke lol |
|
| |
madmanmart staffs.V.duber
Posts : 744 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 4:59 pm | |
| Voted for flush because the other two mean your wheels don't fit your car |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:50 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 7:42 pm | |
| Poke is better than flush lol with abit of poke an alot of low u get the fun off eating the rear tyres lol oj but poke is better sorry |
|
| |
t1m staffs.V.duber
Posts : 778 Join date : 2010-08-19
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:29 pm | |
| got to be flush for me too |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 8:40 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Sun Jan 09, 2011 9:49 pm | |
| here is a pic of the poke on my lupo an what it is doing to the rear tyre lol so here is y poke wins lol |
|
| |
volksdub Newbie
Posts : 11 Join date : 2010-12-06
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:09 pm | |
| Poke if lowered. But depends on what vehicle and ride height. Will get some pics of my MK1 and Lupo |
|
| |
Jon .
Posts : 7423 Join date : 2009-06-17
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:45 pm | |
| Those Tyres don't look very good! |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:16 pm | |
| Ya the tyres are abit eaten up lol hopefully getting arches done soon |
|
| |
madmanmart staffs.V.duber
Posts : 744 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:52 pm | |
| - Vwlupo wrote:
- here is a pic of the poke on my lupo an what it is doing to the rear tyre lol so here is y poke wins lol
I'm sorry but how is that win? The wheels clearly don't fit the car hence dangerous tyres..... |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:00 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 7:24 pm | |
| It's abit dangerous but not that bad arches r getting done very soon either by a m8 or demon Tweeks so it's all good for now |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:18 pm | |
| Get some mew tyres mate it's not worth the risk or the 3 points per tyre the rozzers will stick on you if they catch you |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:19 pm | |
| I was told that the tyre has to be bald or the tyre reinforcer metal has to be seen to get points I'll have to double check with the guy who dose me m.o.t Tomoz now then cheers for the heads up |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 7:45 am | |
| tbh looking at that they will hammer you one big pot hole and that bad boy is a blow out waiting to happen just take it steady mate dont want see a post on here saying a member has been in a serious accident |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:16 am | |
| Don't worry mate I have take it steady cause off all the pot holes anyway an with being so low I have go slow so it will all be sorted soon hopefully fingers crossed |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:21 am | |
| |
|
| |
madmanmart staffs.V.duber
Posts : 744 Join date : 2009-08-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:08 pm | |
| So are you having the arches pulled?
From the pic above you can see that the wheel sticks out about 2" so rolling the arch wont fix the problem. |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:25 pm | |
| Am getting an arch roller and a heat gun off a mate on the weekend so am rolling the arches on Sunday and that pic was when I had 10mm spacers on so they don't stick out as much now so hopefully rolling um will help we shall c aye |
|
| |
wrighty .
Posts : 4314 Join date : 2009-07-20
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:13 pm | |
| As mart says having the arches pulled will sort the problem easy what j are the rims?? I'm guessing 7j with out adaptors they should fit fine mate |
|
| |
Vwlupo Junior Poster
Posts : 73 Join date : 2010-12-10
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:16 pm | |
| My rims are 8j without adaptors am gonna see how rolling my arches gose if that dosent wrk I'll have them pulled oh the joy of being low and having poke lol |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: tuck vs poke vs flush | |
| |
|
| |
|